As I was reading Linda's post and then Randy's it hit me that this goes hand-in-glove with the Genealogy Do-Over and making a research plan or setting research goals for 2016.
The idea is to look at your tree for 10 generations, starting with yourself, and see what percentage of those ancestors you have identified. We all have 1,022 ancestors plus ourselves in ten generations, which takes us back to our 7th great-grandparents, of which we all have 512. That alone boggles my mind whenever I think about it.
As I looked through my tree and calculated my score, I found the results a little depressing once I got past my 3rd great-grandparents. Then I had to remind myself that these numbers only represent those people from whom I am directly descended. I have hundreds of identified relatives in my tree, its just that most of them are collateral ancestors and don't fall into this calculation. And that raises some questions for my research plan.
|CLICK TO ENLARGE|
I enjoy learning as much as I can about my relatives, which includes their siblings, other family and even their friends. But if my goal is to learn who my direct ancestors are, should I spend less time on these cousins and siblings until they are needed to identify direct ancestors? Or should I research as I have been, learning as much about each ancestor as I find them?
It is an interesting question. Time, money and energy are finite. Where should I apply mine this year?
When I do formulate that plan, I'll be sure to let you know.